Modern Day Madness #2: Hey, Occupy Idiots!

•December 5, 2011 • Leave a Comment

Seriously? What in the world are you attempting to accomplish? Have you made any significant progress towards changing anything? How is this going to end? First of all, hell no. This definitely isn’t serious. If it were, we would have seen some progress being made by now. Second, nobody seems to know what your goals are. I don’t even think that you’ve managed to figure it out. As for the third question, see the answer to number one. It hasn’t been serious yet, so no progress. Last but not least, badly. I could be wrong, but I see four possible outcomes, with only one highly unlikely good one.

First outcome: Protesters are eventually broken up and driven away by authorities. Second outcome: Enough of the protesters get bored, start to starve, or are cut off from most conveniences for long enough that they give up. Third outcome: Protesters start responding to violence with violence, and then proceed to get their collective posterior kicked. Fourth outcome: Enough people actually get their crap together that the movement evolves into something worthwhile.

The only reason that Occupy Wall Street(OWS) is even getting attention at this point is because of the violence that’s been surrounding them. As a people, we love violence. It makes for interesting news, and that’s the only reason that people are still watching. Think about it, even the initial interest that the general public showed was spurred by disruptions and arrests during the first staged protests. Protesters have been arrested, pepper sprayed, tear gassed, beaten with batons, and evicted from public areas. People pay attention to these things, but there still hasn’t been a massive public outcry to stop the violence. Yeah, there are plenty of people who have spoken out against it, but not enough. Why? Nobody freaking cares! OWS hasn’t given people enough DIRECTED inspiration, determination, or outright gall to get that kind of support.

Let’s look at the so-called demographic of the OWS protesters. First of all, I haven’t been able to find a consistency between articles about what kind of people are out there. Some articles say that about 70% of the protesters are under age 35, middle class, are mostly white, mostly employed or in school, and don’t identify themselves specifically as democrats or republicans. Others say that there’s a great mix of all ages, races and political views. I’m honestly inclined to believe that most of the protesters are younger, middle class people who are unemployed and have nothing better to do. They don’t even come close to representing the whole of the general public. Just look at their behavior. They run the protests like a bunch of unorganized, sloppy party goers. In one update I even read that they go and celebrate their successes with pizza and dancing. Wow. When in the world did protesting become the equivalent of throwing a massive cookout? And how the hell, if they’re protesting all the time and not working, do they even afford to pay for their use of technology and massive pizza parties?

I do think that it’s interesting that OWS has managed to get last for as long as it has without a leader. In fact, I really like the idea of a movement that’s leaderless. It means that the whole thing can’t be killed by simply crushing it’s head. Unfortunately, it’s really not working out very well. There are plenty of discontented people and more than enough problems that need to be resolved, but there is no guidance to it. I would compare it to having a big pile of construction materials, plenty of workers, all the tools that are needed, solid ground to build on, and not one single, damn architect. If OWS finds a leader that can start building them up, it will be earth shattering. That leader may be targeted and removed, but even if they lay one block of the foundation, other people can step up and take it from there.

Alright, so let’s say that their demographic isn’t really that big an issue, that to succeed they really don’t need a specific lead, and that people should look at what their goals are instead of their behavior. Oh wait, that’s right. They don’t have any. At least not anything specific enough and organized enough to implement. They say that their goal is to end the corruption and negligence of the top 1% of the population and for those people to be held accountable for their past and current actions. That’s great. It’s a wonderful idea, one that a lot of people can agree with. They’ve also failed to implement any type of plan that even remotely accomplishes this. The protesters haven’t set one specific, narrow, achievable goal yet. They need to slowly build up to their main goal through small ones. Right now, it’s either all, or nothing. They’re trying to climb a cliff by running straight up the face of it instead of taking the time to find the handholds they need.

They’ve also managed to screw up their entire main goal COMPLETELY. If OWS really wanted to target the top one percent, and hold them accountable, they’d be called Occupy the Government. Yes, the bankers and the lawyers and big business are the ones who screwed everyone over, but the government let them. The government is the institution that we as a people depend upon to be the guide that keeps our country on track. At some point, probably before most of the protesters were even born, the government freaking derailed. Our country’s leadership is driving us towards a giant inferno of a crash and we’re letting them. Wall Street shouldn’t be the nation’s biggest concern, it should be fixing the government. If our leadership were doing their jobs correctly there would be no Occupy Wall Street. It would have already been fixed, or never been a problem.  OWS is claiming that the only solution is world revolution. Go ahead, type “revolution definition” into google. The first result says that revolution is a FORCIBLE overthrow of a government or social order for a new system. OWS lacks the force necessary, and I believe that they’ve started in the wrong place. Government first, then fix whatever problems are left over. I can almost guarantee that Wall Street won’t be one of them.

I admit that initially I thought that OWS was going to be pretty awesome. I thought that maybe it would be the swift kick in the ass that this nation needs. I was wrong. Now I think of OWS as a bunch of idiots who don’t know what their doing and it looks like that’s unlikely to change. For those who jumped on the bandwagon thinking that it was going to turn into a massive world changing juggernaut, jump off now. The driver’s so blitzed he can’t keep it on the road, the navigator doesn’t know how to read a map, and the rest of the crowd has zoned out, swallowed up in the haze of a clambake. Right now, OWS is destined to crash and burn, and I think that it will ultimately do more harm than good to the people that they were trying to help.

So in conclusion… a few brief statements about how Occupy Wall Street can get its shit together: Quit treating protesting like a party, get serious! Find some freaking amazing leaders! Target the system that has the most power to change things first, the government! If you really want revolution, use more force (don’t say that this is unacceptable, there are non-violent ways to show force)! That’s it. Only four basic statements. Do these things, and even I might be tempted to join in.

Insanity #2: Creation from Imagination

•November 9, 2011 • Leave a Comment

Time for another healthy dose of crazy to balance out your typical, sane lives. In the last article I established the theory that based on common calculations to determine population, there is only one person in the universe (God). If you haven’t read the article, please go back and read it because I shall continue expanding this theory to include some unusual occurrences observed in our lives.

Basically, because we are all a part of God, anyone can influence the world around them. Creation from imagination. A common occurrence resulting from this would be the sensation of Deja Vu. The reason that you feel as though you’ve experienced an event before, is that on some unconscious level, you imagined and planned out the situation beforehand. Planning and implementing the event causes it to happen. You are not necessarily aware that the event was orchestrated in your own mind, so you feel as though you’ve already experienced the event.

Another common example of creation from imagination is available in writing. Multiple instances exist of authors basing a key element of a fiction story on something that was created or discovered after the story was published. For instance, in Jules Verne’s novel 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea, the Nautilis submarine is described to have many of the features a modern day submarine would contain. Many of those features described were not implemented until many years after the initial publication of the novel. In Orson Scott Card’s Ender’s Game, he describes some modern technologies, such as space planes and laptops (albeit in a more advanced form than we possess today). His descriptions of this futuristic technology were considered far-fetched and well beyond the capability to create. Today, many of these advancements already exist or are being developed. While these occurrences could be explained away by saying that scientists were simply inspired by the writings, there are other examples that are harder to explain. Once again, Orson Scott Card wrote about a device in Ender’s Game called the ansible, which was used to communicate across great distances instantly. The basis for the ansible was that a particle was split into pieces and what happened to one piece would happen to the others as well, instantly. After the book was published, it was discovered that some particles did indeed behave in this manner.

While some of you may shudder at the thought, this whole theory could also explain and confirm that some people may possess psychic, telepathic, and telekinetic powers. We are all really just part of the same mind, so why shouldn’t a person be able to read others’ thoughts? Time and the continued existence of ourselves is dependent on the our mind creating the future, so why wouldn’t we be able to see into the future we create? The world around us is all just a construct that we’ve brought forth in our imagination so why shouldn’t we be able to manipulate it with our minds?

Food for thought. May cause serious indigestion of the mind if contemplated for too long. Good luck.

Modern Day Madness #1: Why the hell is being a politician a lifetime job?

•October 11, 2011 • Leave a Comment

Once upon a time the people who led and ran this nation were rebels. They were farmers, inventors, writers, soldiers, etc… not a single one of them was just a politician. Why has that changed? I would say that most of the people in government offices have been politicians, big-business owners, or just freaking rich throughout most of their adult life. The leaders of this country are people whose entire life goal has been to gain power for themselves.

The people that we know as the founding fathers became leaders of the people, because they were part the people. The population followed them because the founding fathers worked alongside the rest of the people. They did not seek power just for themselves, but for the entire nation.  Leaders fought, died, worked, and lived just like everyone else. They led through example. At the birth of this nation, we did indeed have a government for the people, by the people.

Today, being a “leader” is not setting an example through action. The politicians of our country just have to be good at manipulation. It no longer matters how much positive change a leader can make, it just matters that they can get popular enough to win a vote. Those in office rapidly lose touch with what little (if anything), they had in touch with the common people. They become elitists, living in a way that is far different than the rest of the population. How, then, are they supposed to be able to make decisions governing the general population?

The government is no longer for the people, by the people. It is for the common, by the elite. For the many, by the few. For the 99%, by the 1%.

Insanity #1: Population of the Unviverse

•October 8, 2011 • Leave a Comment

If you want to determine population of an area, you take the number of people and divide by the total area. For instance, if there are 4000 people in an area of 2000 sqaure miles, then the population measurement would state that there are two people per square mile. However, if you try to apply this simple mathematical process to the universe as a whole, then it is proven to be flawed.

The universe is infinite, so if there is a fixed number of people present, then determining the population by the simple mathematic process above is impossible. Any number divided by infinity is zero. So the population of the universe would be zero. However, there has to be at least one person in the universe because I exist. Therefore the process of determining population is completly wrong.

The other aspect of this problem is that the process of determining population could be completely correct, and would verify the existence of the being that we know as God. If we allow for an infinite amount of people to be present in the infinite amount of area that is the universe, then the population is one. Any number divided by itself is equal to one. Infinity divided by infinity would be equal to 1.

If there is only one being in the universe then that being is obviously the person we refer to as God. This person is our creator and the creator of all that which is around us because everything is simply a figment of his imagination. Think about it, if you were the only being in existence, the loneliness would drive you insane. God suffers from (or quite possibly enjoys), being crazy In essence, we are all the same being, just different parts.

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 197 other followers